The Argument Against Tobacco Censorship

Transparency
Scientific Integrity
Peer Review Process
Scientific Censorship
Tobacco Harm Reduction

Tobacco harm reduction must be driven by quality science and data, irrespective of the source of that science and data. This short commentary looks at scientific censorship, and argues that with robust protocols to manage potential conflicts of interest and rigorous peer review all science can and should be judged on its merits objectively.

Sarah Cooney

British American Tobacco

2021

Year of Production

5 Minutes
53 Seconds

English Subtitles

Science

Category

Interview

Format

More Like This